The Effects of Re-Usable Green and Clean Energy on Germany
and Its Economy.
Introduction.
There
is increased advocacy for the use of re-usable green and clean energy as an
alternative to non-renewable energy sources and as a means of combating climate
change (Heal 3). In Germany, environmentalists have been on the forefront in
endorsing, publicizing and advocating for use of environmentally-friendly
energy sources with great emphasis being placed on clean re-usable energy.
However, German economists have stated that reliance on renewable energy
exposes the German economy to energy instability due to the intermittency of
such energy sources (for instance, wind power and solar power) and the
insufficiency of their current storage technologies that cannot overcome the
instances of intermittency. According to these economists, if complete
decarbonization of the current German economy will necessitate the need for use
of nuclear power and CSS (Carbon Capture and Storage) to maintain energy efficiency,
and the use of these energy sources does have economic implications. Moreover,
efficient and innovative energy storage technologies are still non-operational
(Scheer 110).
Other
economists support use of renewable energy due to their favorable projected
market dynamics, easy incorporation into existing energy systems and their
uncomplicated conformity into the matrix of energy economics (Scheer 117).
Energy Economics.
Energy
and economy do interact to bring into being a new field termed energy
economics. Since re-usable green and clean energy is considered as a source of
energy, its effects are bound to have economic implications which are covered
in energy economics.
Energy
economics is a complex matrix that encompasses input from political sciences,
energy engineering, ecology, economic realities and geology. In Germany, its
energy economics encompasses the following concerns (Sickles 45):
1. Sustainability of the
current energy sources.
2. The government climate
policy with reference to global climate change.
3. Environmental and energy
policies.
4. Analysis of the stability
of current energy supplies, and energy elasticity.
5. Current and forecasted
demand for energy and energy derivatives.
6. Current state of the
energy market elasticity with reference to regulation, deregulation and market
liberalization.
7. Overall national economic
growth.
Based
on the above aspects of energy economics, Germany has prioritized its energy
needs and supply dynamics vis-à-vis energy sources (Kitasei & Mastny 39).
This has led the nation to create a viable renewable energy sector that has
been able to generate over 20% of the total electricity output. This has led to
increased investment in renewable energy thus making Germany a notable
renewable energy economy. The commercialization of renewable energy has
revealed the potential of the renewable energy market, with the major
challenges being in the network capacities for power generation, transmission
and storage. The government has taken interest in renewable energy due to its
potential of creating employment, increasing industrial productivity,
optimizing economic output and fostering innovativeness in the energy sector.
This has led the government to re-orient its energy policy from the centralized
demand and supply model to one that fosters energy efficiency. This new policy
has enabled Germany to surpass the renewable electricity target set by the
European Union (EU) (Preuß, Höhne & Stein 83).
Renewable Energy Sources.
Both
the public and private sector have identifiable several viable renewable energy
sources that are worth investing in as they do have a significant impact of the
economy. Renewable energy is a collective term that describes a specially
defined classification of sources of energy that are derived from continuously
replenished resources such as wind, tidal waves, geothermal energy and
rainfall. Renewable energy were initially harnessed in large-scale in order for
them to be economically viable, but currently due to advancement of energy
technologies, clean energy can be produced in small-scale facilities and still
remain economically viable (Baietti, Shlyakhtenko, La Rocca & Patel 131).
The
individual sources of re-usable green and clean energy are discussed hereafter
in reference to their impact on the German economy.
1. Wind Power.
Wind
power has been identified as a viable renewable energy sources by several major
players in the private sector such as Siemens, Enercon, Repower, Nordex and
Fuhrländer. The energy producing unit of a wind power plant is the wind turbine
which requires airflow to operate. Thus, wind farms must be located in areas
which have constant airflows such as high altitudes and offshore locations.
Offshore locations have airflow rates that are almost double the rates in the
mainland. Hence, in Germany, the preferred locations are situated in the North
Sea and the surrounding areas. A utility-scale wind turbine has a capacity of
producing 600-5000 Kilowatts (kW). These two abovementioned capacity factors
influence the total amount of energy that can harvested from wind energy.
However, the cost of setting up offshore wind farms is substantially greater
than the cost of setting these wind farms in the mainland. This explains why
the government still prefers to build wind farms on the mainland (Witzel & Seifried 197).
Currently,
over 22,000 wind turbines have been built in the federal area with more
projected to be built in the coming years. On the whole, Germany is estimated
to have an installed capacity of over 30,000 Megawatts of wind power, which
contributes a total of about 10 % of the total electricity output (Stolten
& Scherer 75).
Private
energy-producing firms have placed a particular emphasis on offshore wind farms
in order to maximize their revenues, create employment opportunities, optimize
their capacity for energy generation and test their novel inventions and
innovations. The government also considers offshore wind farms as a prudent investment
opportunity, but it is currently focused on building wind power plants in
Germany. This is based on cost-benefit analysis feasibility studies (Baietti,
Shlyakhtenko, La Rocca & Patel 173).
The
major challenge facing wind power generation is insufficient network capacities
which constrain power transmission from the North Sea to the industrial
heartland of the nation (Siebert 41).
2. Solar Power.
Energy derived from the sun does contribute about 3% of the
total industrial electrical energy output. The solar energy reaches earth as
radiation energy which can be used to heat engines (utilized as concentrated
solar power) or generate electricity directly by striking photovoltaic cells
(in solar panels). German solar technologies have been classified as either
active or passive depending on the way they capture, transduce and utilize
solar energy. Most passive technologies are being used by private firms while
the government concentrates mainly on active solar technologies. Active solar
technologies involve solar thermal collectors and photovoltaic panels to
collect and harness the solar radiation. Thus, solar parks have to be
established in order to generate commercially viable electrical energy. Such
parks are built in areas with adequate sunshine, and thus the land used is
unavailable for other economic activities. Hence, before a site is selected for
installation of solar parks, it must be evaluated for its economic potential
and the probability of using alternative energy supplies. There are several
solar parks in the country, for example the Erlasee Solar Park (Scherer 37).
Currently, the installed cumulative solar power exceeds 30 Gigawatts (GW),
comparable to the energy produced by about 20 nuclear power plants. Most of it
this solar energy is derived from photovoltaic panels installed in individual
homes. Hence, solar power can provide over 50% of electricity needed for
domestic purposes nationwide. Current market analyses forecast increased use of
solar electricity and decrease in the cost of installation, thus making it a
viable renewable energy source. Moreover, solar energy can be captured and
harnessed as solar fuel in automobiles and industries (Scherer 59).
The
economic viability of the solar energy market is illustrated by facts that it
has reduced the cost of producing electricity while concurrently creating
employment in the burgeoning solar industry (Brown & Sovacool 127).
3. Geothermal Power.
There is a geothermal power plant situated at
Neustadt-Glewe in the North of Germany. Geothermal power is derived from
thermal energy which is stored deep in the earth. The geothermal gradient
maintains continuous conduction of the thermal energy though rocks from the
core of the earth to the surface. Geothermal energy can be collected at
specific locations on the surface of the earth (Witzel & Seifried 114).
In specific locations, geothermal energy does heat
underground water which later emerges through fissures as hot springs which can
drive turbines to generate electricity. The government has enacted laws to
benefit generation of electricity from geothermal sources. These laws do
guarantee a feed-in tariff scheme; and, this has led to the construction of new
geothermal power plants with some of them becoming operational (Mendon 96).
4. Hydroelectricity.
Water is considerably denser than air, thus a slow flowing
water stream could produce considerable energy. However, water energy can be
collected at specific sites only. This energy can be harnessed as
hydro-electric energy or micro-hydro systems (Witzel & Seifried 54). In Germany, the
installed capacity exceeds 5 GW, thus contributing over 3.5% of the total
industrial electrical energy output. The
economic turnover of the hydropower sector is estimated to be about €1.23
billion. Moreover, the sector has created employment opportunities for over
9,000 people (Jordan-Korte 43).
5. Biomass.
According to statistics, both biofuels and
biomass account for 70% of the total renewable energy and 30% of electricity
generated from renewable energy sources in homes. However, its contribution to
industrial or large-scale electricity generation is minimal.
Biomass is can be considered as a store of solar energy. It
can be used as a source of energy if the energy extraction rate is less than
the production rate (Witzel & Seifried 112). This requires complex and
intricate technologies that could enhance the efficiency of energy extraction.
Such technologies are possessed by wealthy private German firms which can
therefore produce energy from biomass. However, due to the high cost of
installation and operation of biomass energy plants, they are not used
commonly, with preference being given to biofuels and unprocessed biomass.
Nonetheless, the bio-based economy does create employment opportunities, and it
also promotes disposal of organic wastes in an economically-viable way. It is
projected that the bio-based economy would double in value by 2017 (Sovacool
147).
6. Biofuels.
Biofuels are derivatives of biomass. They exist in three
forms: solid fuels, liquid fuels (such as bioalcohols and biodiesel) and
biogases (such as landfill gases, synthetic gases and biogas) (Witzel & Seifried 152).
Ethanol can undergo combustion, and as such it has been
used as motor vehicle fuel and as gasoline additive. Bioethanol can also be
used for similar purposes. Bioethanol is derived from starch crops and sugar,
and this has created dilemma among policymakers regarding its place in the
environmental, agricultural and economic policy frameworks (Witzel & Seifried 157). Economists
have argued that land used to grow crops for biofuels in Germany could have
been put to better, economically-rewarding alternative uses. On the upside,
several German companies have developed technologies that allow them to extract
bioethanol from cellulosic biomass. The production costs of bioethanol are
commensurate to the energy benefits (Brown & Sovacool 47).
Biodiesel is derived from animal fats and vegetable oils by
the chemical process of trans-esterification. Recycled greases have also been
used to produce biodiesel. The main use of biodiesel is as an additive to
diesel. It can also be used as motor vehicle fuel. Biodiesel is more commonly
used in Germany than bioethanol (Witzel & Seifried 158).
The major setback against utilization of biofuels is that
better (renewable energy sources) alternatives exist. Moreover, the EEA
(European Environment Agency) has stated that biofuels do contribute to global
warming by increasing the content of hydrocarbon combustion products in the
atmosphere. However, Germany has enacted the biofuel quota act which aims to
blend petroleum with biofuels by 2014 (Kitasei & Mastny 93).
Industry
and Clean Energy.
One of the significant effects of re-usable green and clean
energy on Germany and its economy has been the growth of the renewable energy
sector as described below.
Germany has developed the most successful, efficient and
innovative renewable energy sector in the globe. World-class wind power industries
such as Siemens, Enercon, Repower, Nordex and Fuhrländer have established
energy production plants in Germany, with some of the industries having their
headquarters in German cities. Multinational solar power industries that have
established bases in Germany include Conergy, SolarWorld and Q-Cells. The
establishment of industrial plants by these companies has consolidated the
German energy market while strengthening the overall German economy by
stabilizing and securing energy supplies. This has enabled Germany to have a
competitive edge in the international market especially against its
sophisticated market competitors who include the US, China and Japan in the
solar energy market, and the US, Spain and Denmark in the wind energy market
(Jordan-Korte 55).
Statistics show that the clean energy sector does provide
employment to about a million people. This number is projected to increase as
the government strives for greater contribution of clean energy to the overall
energy market (Lehr1& Lutz1 6).
The economic viability of clean energy has led large
multinationals such as Siemens to create new portfolios that are focused on
renewable energy. An example of such a portfolio is Siemens environmental
solutions which generated about €27 billion in 2011, and is projected to
generate €40 billion in 2015. Siemens has even downgraded its involvement in
the nuclear industry with preference being paid to the adoption of green
technology (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 87).
Energiewende.
Another significant effect of re-usable green and clean
energy on Germany and its economy has been the adoption of a comprehensive
energy policy termed Energiewende which
is discussed below.
In 2010, policymakers within the German government decided
to review the energy policy of the nation with particular emphasis placed in
clean renewable energy, energy conservation and efficiency in energy usage.
This necessitated the reorientation of the energy policy away from
demand-supply market dynamics and a centralized energy production and distribution
model to a policy that favors energy conservation, adequacy of energy
generation(while concurrently minimizing overproduction) and efficiency in
energy utilization. This policy was formulated and its documentation was
complete by September 2010. The policy was designated as Energiewende which can be translated
into English as Energy transition. The legislature supported the adoption of
the policy in 2011(Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 111).
The basic precepts of Energiewende
are reductions in greenhouse gas emission by over 80% by 2050, increased
share of renewable energy to about 60% of the total energy by 2050, efficiency
in electricity and energy consumption by 2050; and, increased commitment of
resources to research and development of renewable energy sources (Stolten,
Detlef & Scherer 113).
Since the federal government embraced the Energiewende, there has been an
expansion in the renewable energy sector due to the various incentives adopted,
enacted and/or provided by the government to private commercial entities. For
instance, tax and tariff benefits have increased investment in the geothermal
sector. This is because a fixed feed-in tariff lasting for duration of 20 years
does guarantee the potential energy producer of a fixed income within the same
period. Energy co-operatives were created and the federal government
favored decentralization of market control and capital flows. This led to large
energy industries to have an inordinately minor share of the clean energy
market in comparison to their overall market value. Increased energy output
from the clean energy sector has led to closure of several nuclear power plants
with nine other operational plants being slated for closure before their
planned time of decommissioning (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 121).
The IEA (International Energy Agency) has applauded Germany
for the development, adoption and implementation of Energiewende because it has increased energy efficiency while
concurrently reducing emission of greenhouse gases. According to IEA, Energiewende is founded on long-term
energy investment consideration. Germany is a large nation that is centrally
located in continental Europe with a large population, and a robust modern
economy. This means that Germany has a stabilizing role in maintaining the
existing European energy systems. Thus, further improvement of Energiewende is needed. These
improvements would correspond to the national energy policy ambitions vis-à-vis
the economy and its penetrance into the continental European energy systems.
This would enable the Energiewende to
strike a practical equilibrium between market competiveness, product
affordability and energy sustainability (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer
137).
Currently, German energy consumers have absorbed Energiewende-related costs, but there
has been debates concerning the economic impacts of Energiewende as the renewable energy share of the market has
increased simultaneously with increasing electricity costs. De-carbonization of
the energy market requires public goodwill and this entails the stabilization
of the retail energy market with the retail electricity costs remaining cheap.
However, the current electricity costs in Germany are relatively expensive when
compared to European standards despite cheap wholesale energy prices. This has
led energy policymakers to favor large-scale commercialization of renewable
energy (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 150).
Commercialization of renewable energy.
Another
significant effect of re-usable green and clean energy on Germany and its
economy has been the commercialization of renewable energy as discussed below.
The
commercialization of renewable energy involves the utilization of energy
technologies (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 41). These energy
technologies can be chronologically classified as first, second and third
generation technologies. First-generation renewable energy technologies are
economically mature and possess a competitive edge in the energy market.
Examples include biomass plants, solar panels, geothermal power and
hydroelectric power. The second-generation energy technologies are ready for
the market and as such are being deployed presently. Examples include special
photovoltaic solar cells, solar thermal plants and utility wind power plants.
Finally, the third-generation energy technologies are undergoing extensive
research and development efforts that would mold them to be globally
competitive. Examples include ocean tidal energy, advanced biomass gasification
and the dry-rock geothermal power (Witzel & Seifried 27 ).
Germany
is one of the countries that have invested heavily on third-generation
technologies. This can be attributed to the growth of the clean energy sector
and governmental promotional incentives and policies. This enabled the German
clean energy sector to weather the European financial crisis. Moreover,
technological advancement has decreased the cost of producing clean energy due
to the benefits of increased market competition and qualitative mass production.
The government is currently strengthening the national grid-connected capacity
in order to levelise the price of electrical energy which would in turn endear
clean energy to the public (Stolten, Detlef & Scherer 44).
Commercialization
of clean energy was necessitated by the need to reduce environmental pollution,
minimize climate change and avert energy insecurity. Such commercialization
leads to the incorporation of large quantities of clean energy into energy
supply portfolio thus reducing German’s dependency of fossil fuel whose supply
is fraught with uncertainties such as Middle East politics, terrorism and
economic sabotage through disruption of supply routes (Brown & Sovacool 15)
Commercialization
of energy sources is significantly influenced by politics and public policy.
Thus, in Germany the political leadership and government policymakers are
responsible for balancing the market in order to ensure that there is fair
competition so that new market entrants can showcase their novel technologies.
This has led to an unprecedented level of technological advancement in the
clean energy sector, which has increased the efficiency of energy production
and utilization. Moreover, these energy technologies can also be used in
related economic fields thus maximizing the economic output of Germany.
Furthermore, green technology does minimize the rate of climate change, thus
stabilizing agricultural output hence shielding the nation from the
unpredictable fluctuation of food prices (Siebert 56).
For
industries, clean energy has provided them with a dependable, cheap and
efficacious alternative to fossil fuels. Moreover, it enables such companies to
win acclaim from environmental groups and this in turn improves their market
performance. This has led to the consolidation and expansion of the German
industrial base (Siebert 65).
Conclusion.
Re-usable
green and clean energy has been advocated by economists, industrialists and
environmentalists alike as a better alternative to fossil fuels because they
cause less pollution minimize climate change and avert energy insecurity.
However, some economists do state that reliance on renewable energy exposes the
German economy to energy instability due to the intermittency of such energy
sources and the insufficiency of their current storage technologies. . The
energy economics of Germany encompasses the following concerns: sustainability
of the current energy sources, government climate policy with reference to
global climate change, environmental and energy policies, energy elasticity,
energy forecasts, state of energy markets and the national economic growth. The
government has taken interest in renewable energy due to its potential of
creating employment, increasing industrial productivity, optimizing economic
output and fostering innovativeness in the energy sector. This encouraged the
government to formulate, adopt and implement a comprehensive energy policy
known as Energiewende which was
applauded by the IEA for its energy efficiency and environmental-friendliness.
The main re-usable green and clean energy sources in Germany are wind power
which contributes a total of about 10 % of the total electricity output, solar
power which contributes about 3% of the total industrial electrical energy
output, geothermal power, hydropower, biomass and biofuels.
Private
energy-producing firms have invested in clean energy in order to maximize their
revenues, create employment opportunities, optimize their capacity for energy
generation and test their novel inventions and innovations.
In
summary, the significant effects of re-usable green and clean energy on Germany
and its economy have been the growth of the renewable energy sector, adoption
of Energiewende and the commercialization of renewable energy.
Works Cited.
Heal,
Geoffrey. “The Economics of Renewable
Energy”. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15081
(2009):1-31. Print.
Sickles,
Robin. Energy Economics. New York:
Palgrave Publishers, 2008. Print.
Lehr1,
Ulrike and Lutz1, Christian. “Green Jobs? Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy
in Germany.” World Renewable Energy
Congress-Policy Issues (2011): 1-8. Print.
Brown,
Marilyn and Sovacool, Benjamin. Climate
Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options. Massachusetts:
MIT Press, 2011. Print.
Witzel,
Walter and Seifried,
Dieter. Renewable Energy - The Facts. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print
Preuß,
Marion; Höhne,
Nina and Stein, Denis. Economical
Implications of Shutdowns of Nuclear Power in Germany. Hamburg: GRIN
Verlag, 2012.Print.
Sovacool,
Benjamin. Contesting the Future of
Nuclear Power. New York: World
Scientific 2011.Print.
Mendon,
Miguel. Powering the Green Economy: The
Feed-in Tariff Handbook. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.
Kitasei,
Saya and Mastny, Lisa. Powering the
Low-carbon Economy: The Once and Future Roles of Renewable Energy. New
York: Worldwatch Institute. 2010. Print.
Baietti,
Aldo; Shlyakhtenko, Andrey ; La Rocca, Roberto and Patel, Urvaksh. Green Infrastructure Finance: Leading
Initiatives and Research. New York: The World Bank. 2012. Print.
Scherer,
Hermann. The Solar Economy: Renewable
Energy for a Sustainable Global Future. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.
Jordan-Korte,
Katrin. Government Promotion of Renewable
Energy Technologies. New York: Springer, 2011. Print.
Siebert,
Horst. The German Economy: Beyond the
Social Market. New York: Princeton University Press, 2005. Print.
Scheer,
Hermann. Energy Autonomy: The Economic,
Social and Technological Case for Renewable Energy. New York:
Earthscan, 2007. Print.
Stolten,
Detlef and Scherer, Viktor. Transition
to Renewable Energy Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only comments that conform to the natural laws of decency and formal language will be displayed on this blog.